[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <188876289.142981278959629700.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:33:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: CVE request: ghostscript
----- "Marc Deslauriers" <marc.deslauriers@...onical.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 11:00 -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
> > * [2010-07-12 12:48:35 -0400] Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> >
> > >I believe this is identical to CVE-2010-1869
> > >(http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2010-1869).
> >
> > They don't look identical to me. Patches differ, upstream bugs differ.
> >
> > Can't really do anything hands-on to test since the PoC attached to the
> > upstream bug is private.
>
> The reproducer for CVE-2010-1869 does trigger it on 8.64 for me, but I
> would consider it a separate issue.
>
We'll give it a seperate CVE id, it seems to be a different issue.
As it's from 2009:
Use CVE-2009-4897
Thanks.
--
JB
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
