Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278955496.2863.18.camel@mdlinux.technorage.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:24:56 -0400
From: Marc Deslauriers <marc.deslauriers@...onical.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: CVE request: ghostscript

On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 11:00 -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
> * [2010-07-12 12:48:35 -0400] Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> 
> >I believe this is identical to CVE-2010-1869
> >(http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2010-1869).
> 
> They don't look identical to me.  Patches differ, upstream bugs differ.
> 
> Can't really do anything hands-on to test since the PoC attached to the
> upstream bug is private.

The reproducer for CVE-2010-1869 does trigger it on 8.64 for me, but I
would consider it a separate issue.

Marc.


-- 
Marc Deslauriers
Ubuntu Security Engineer     | http://www.ubuntu.com/
Canonical Ltd.               | http://www.canonical.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.