[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E953D53.2000107@hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:10:11 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: JtR CUDA ????
On 2011-10-11 21:16, Marsman007 wrote:
>>> Or plans to have sapb/sapg in CUDA??
>>
>> BTW, both these formats still use generic (non-SSE) MD5 and SHA-1. I
>> believe they can be made a lot faster without "resorting" to GPU.
>>
> Not sure what to do with you 'BTW' remark.
> Are you saying that sapb is just a salted MD5?
There is some proprietry "magic" as well as salting but that part
doesn't look slow. Other than that, sapG is 2xSHA1 and sapB is 2xMD5. I
presume it would be a walk in the park (for guys like JimF or Bartavelle
if they had time/incentive) to utilise the existing intrinsics or asm
funtions, for a decent boost. And this could/should still be combined
with OMP.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
