[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230615183839.GA12628@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 20:38:39 +0200
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: distros list archive
Hi,
I've just made a further update of these, until May 31, 2023.
Alexander
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 07:08:42PM +0100, Solar Designer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just updated the headers-only archives of (linux-)distros mentioned
> in the message below to include headers of everything posted until
> December 31, 2020. There was relatively little need for this for a
> while due to the statistics kindly maintained by Gentoo, but now those
> are lagging behind (last updated until September 2019 inclusive). They
> will need to also be updated, and I felt updating these archives might
> help with hopefully making that upcoming update and with its review.
>
> Alexander
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:42:05PM +0100, Solar Designer wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 06:39:50PM +0200, Solar Designer wrote:
> > > I've just set up these archives of the private lists up until June 19:
> > >
> > > http://www.openwall.com/lists/linux-distros/
> > > http://www.openwall.com/lists/distros/
> > >
> > > I did not decrypt the actual messages, but the statistics and the
> > > message headers should provide some visibility into how much and roughly
> > > what was discussed and when.
> >
> > I've just updated these with message headers until November 19 (although
> > there was nothing posted after November 9, until further still-embargoed
> > messages appeared today).
> >
> > > The messages appearing on distros should be strictly a subset of those
> > > appearing on linux-distros, as per the description of the lists here:
> > >
> > > http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros
> > >
> > > As you may notice, the Subject lines sometimes contain [vs] and other
> > > times [vs-plain]. This reflects whether the messages traveled to the
> > > list exploder in encrypted or plaintext form, respectively. They
> > > traveled to the list members in re-encrypted form either way. The
> > > [vs-plain] case commonly occurs on messages CC'ed to other parties, for
> > > which the sender might not have had the keys. MUAs generally don't
> > > allow a message to be encrypted to a subset of the addressees and sent
> > > in plaintext to others.
> > >
> > > Enjoy.
> >
> > Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
