[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171120224205.GA14494@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 23:42:05 +0100
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: distros list archive
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 06:39:50PM +0200, Solar Designer wrote:
> I've just set up these archives of the private lists up until June 19:
>
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/linux-distros/
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/distros/
>
> I did not decrypt the actual messages, but the statistics and the
> message headers should provide some visibility into how much and roughly
> what was discussed and when.
I've just updated these with message headers until November 19 (although
there was nothing posted after November 9, until further still-embargoed
messages appeared today).
> The messages appearing on distros should be strictly a subset of those
> appearing on linux-distros, as per the description of the lists here:
>
> http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros
>
> As you may notice, the Subject lines sometimes contain [vs] and other
> times [vs-plain]. This reflects whether the messages traveled to the
> list exploder in encrypted or plaintext form, respectively. They
> traveled to the list members in re-encrypted form either way. The
> [vs-plain] case commonly occurs on messages CC'ed to other parties, for
> which the sender might not have had the keys. MUAs generally don't
> allow a message to be encrypted to a subset of the addressees and sent
> in plaintext to others.
>
> Enjoy.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
