[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171003153340.GA26029@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 17:33:40 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Linux kernel CVEs not mentioned on oss-security
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 09:00:38AM -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Yeah, this one keeps trying to get re-introduced as a "fix", when it
> > really isn't (see the archives of the stable@...r mailing list for
> > details.
> >
> > I don't know how you can "reject" a CVE, is there a proceedure
> > somewhere? There's lots of CVEs out there that people create against
> > the kernel that just aren't issues at all, but I've been ignoring them
> > as it makes people happy to assign and track them for no reason.
>
>
> > Is there some way a project can get them rejected?
> >
>
> As mentioned before, there is the cveform page at https://cveform.mitre.org/
> which can be used to update CVEs, including asking for REJECT. Simply chose
> "Request an update to an existing CVE entry" then in "Type of update
> requested" please choose "Rejection".
>
> AN EASY WAY TO INTERACT WITH CVE TO UPDATE/REJECT/ETC PLEASE IS TO USE THE
> CVEFORM.
>
> CVEFORM URL: https://cveform.mitre.org/
Well, it's not as easy as using email, but ok, I've attempted to submit
a "reject this CVE" for the above mentioned one, let's see what happens
:)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
