Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161027083901.GA10554@lorien.valinor.li>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:39:01 +0200
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: bperry.volatile@...il.com, cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: Re: Re: Handful of libass issues

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:23:22PM -0400, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> > The third is a huge memory allocation leading to a crash that wasn't
> > fixed because a good solution is unavailable at the moment.
> 
> Use CVE-2016-7971.

It looks from the discussion in
https://github.com/libass/libass/pull/240 that this issue is disputed
to be actually in libass.

Should the CVE assignment be revisited, possibly rejected, according
the upstream discussion?

Regards,
Salvatore

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.