Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160609080613.GA3694@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 10:06:13 +0200
From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>
To: OSS Security List <oss-security@...ts.openwall.com>,
	cve-assign@...re.org
Subject: CVE Request: ruby openssl hostname verification issue

Hi,

This probably warrants a CVE:

https://github.com/ruby/openssl/issues/8

quoting:

Even if OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_PEER is configured, I/O is allowed with a
remote server before the subject has been verified. VERIFY_PEER only
checks the cert chain is rooted in the local truststore. It does not
check if the subject is valid in and of itself.

My understanding is the ssl_socket.post_connection_check(hostname) method
must be called to ensure the subject is correctly verified. However,
communication is allowed to remote services without verifying the subject.

I would suggest throwing an exception if VERIFY_PEER is configured and
I/O is attempted without first calling post_connection_check

It would also be nice if this all happened automatically simply by
passing hostname into OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket (which AFAICT only affects
SNI presently, and not subject verification)

----

Ciao, Marcus
-- 
Marcus Meissner,SUSE LINUX GmbH; Maxfeldstrasse 5; D-90409 Nuernberg; Zi. 3.1-33,+49-911-740 53-432,,serv=loki,mail=wotan,type=real <meissner@...e.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.