Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160223164136.GA24225@altlinux.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:41:36 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Access to /dev/pts devices via pt_chown and user namespaces

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 07:17:54PM +0300, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:03:54PM +0000, halfdog wrote:
> > Sending content from [0] also to oss-security as requested last time:
> 
> Thank you.  This public disclosure is very late, though.  I didn't
> realize you were still holding some of your findings on this.
> 
> > With Ubuntu Wily and earlier, /usr/lib/pt_chown was used to change
> > ownership of slave pts devices in /dev/pts to the same uid holding the
> > master file descriptor for the slave.
> 
> I think pt_chown is only needed for legacy BSD pty's, and no longer
> needed for Unix 98 pty's that Linux systems use these days.  Perhaps it
> should be dropped from upstream glibc by now.

Just for the record, pt_chown is not enabled by default in upstream glibc
starting with glibc-2.18, one has to specify --enable-pt_chown configure
option explicitly to build pt_chown.

glibc documentation clearly states that "the use of pt_chown introduces
additional security risks to the system and you should enable it only
if you understand and accept those risks":
https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Configuring-and-compiling.html#index-grantpt-1


-- 
ldv

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.