[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151226104143.GA26606@gremlin.ru>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 13:41:43 +0300
From: gremlin@...mlin.ru
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Being vulnerable to POODLE
On 2015-12-26 07:28:52 +0000, Sevan Janiyan wrote:
> Hi, If you have a piece of software which is vulnerable to POODLE,
> should a CVE be requested for it or should CVE-2014-3566 just be
> referenced in any advisories published?
The POODLE is an OpenSSL vulnerability, so referencing CVE-2014-3566
should be enough.
> It turns out that CoovaChilli is vulnerable to POODLE & I'd
> like to follow the correct procedure regarding disclosure. There's
> a fix pending due to needing further testing at which point an
> advisory will be published with the necessary details.
Does the update of OpenSSL eliminate this vulnerability?
--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
