[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150814130403.GA15575@eldamar.local>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:04:03 +0200
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: CVE Assignments MITRE <cve-assign@...re.org>
Subject: Re: CVE request: GNUTLS-SA-2015-3 double free in
certificate DN decoding
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:23:02AM +0200, Martin Prpic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> GnuTLS released versions 3.4.4 and 3.3.17 that fix one security issue:
>
> http://www.gnutls.org/security.html#GNUTLS-SA-2015-3
>
> "Kurt Roeckx reported that decoding a specific certificate with very
> long DistinguishedName (DN) entries leads to double free, which may
> result to a denial of service. Since the DN decoding occurs in almost
> all applications using certificates it is recommended to upgrade the
> latest GnuTLS version fixing the issue. Recommendation: Upgrade to
> GnuTLS 3.4.4, or 3.3.17."
>
> The upstream patch that fixes this issue is available at:
>
> https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/commit/272854367efc130fbd4f1a51840d80c630214e12
>
> Can a CVE please be assigned to this issue?
>
> Also, there is still no CVE for the issue before this one. The CVE
> request was sent on May 5:
>
> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q2/367
>
> Can a CVE be assigned to this as well?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Refs:
> rhbz GNUTLS-SA-2015-2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1218426
> rhbz GNUTLS-SA-2015-3: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1251902
Adding explicitly MITRE CVE assignment team to the loop.
Can CVEs be assigned for both GNUTLS-SA-2015-2 and GNUTLS-SA-2015-3
issues?
Regards,
Salvatore
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
