|
Message-ID: <20150730101508.3530416a@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:15:08 +0200 From: Stefan Cornelius <scorneli@...hat.com> To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org> Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, CVE Assignments MITRE <cve-assign@...re.org> Subject: Re: net-snmp snmp_pdu_parse() function incompletely initializaition vulnerability On Sun, 10 May 2015 13:06:48 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:05:57PM +0200, Stefan Cornelius wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:44:04 +0800 > > 罗大龙 <luodalongde@...il.com> wrote: > > > > > HI there, > > > > > > > > > > > > Greeting! This is Qinghao Tang from QIHU 360 company, China. I > > > am a security researcher there. > > > > > > I'm writing to apply for a CVE ID, for a 0day vulnerability in > > > net-snmp. Please refer to below report. > > > > > > > The upstream patch is here: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/f23bcd3ac6ddee5d0a48f9703007ccc738914791/ > > > > As linked from the commit, the (currently restricted) upstream bug > > is: https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2615/ > > > > Although this leads to crashes at different locations, all of them > > can be attributed to snmp_pdu_parse() leaving stale > > netsnmp_variable_list items in the list, so I think one CVE should > > be enough. > > > > > > In case anyone is interested, the Red Hat bug is: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212408 > > Explicitly adding MITREs CVE assignment team to the CC list. > > Any news on this? Unfortunately the upstream bug report ist still > restricted. > > Thanks and regards, > Salvatore Hi, As far as I can tell, this still needs a CVE. Thanks, -- Stefan Cornelius / Red Hat Product Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.