[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACYkhxivV_Uob6B0AfTL07g=kFmQK0t7Uky0O7Z6-ZjbKpw+pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:41:51 +1100
From: Michael Samuel <mik@...net.net>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: is MD5 finally dead?
Hi,
On 5 November 2014 15:21, Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote:
> http://natmchugh.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/how-i-created-two-images-with-same-md5.html
>
> It seems like MD5 should probably be classed with DES as instant CVE
> win, either now, or pretty soon....
This is the same chosen-prefix attack that was used to forge
certificates. Using md5 in
a collision-hostile environment is definitely CVE worthy, and has been
for a while. (BTW,
no CVE for rsync yet)
In the case of an unknown-prefix, HMAC[1] or anything requiring a preimage, it's
just hardening to use swap out MD5 (and SHA-1).
[1] Unless you accidentally swap the key and data fields!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
