oss-security - Re: Re: CVE request: a2ps insecure temporary file use

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52F1EE61.2020105@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:55:13 +1100
From: Murray McAllister <mmcallis@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: cve-assign@...re.org, 737385@...s.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re: CVE request: a2ps insecure temporary file
 use

On 02/05/2014 01:40 AM, cve-assign@...re.org wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060630#c5
>>
>> * Fri Jan 05 2001 Preston Brown <pbrown@...hat.com>
>> - security patch for tmpfile creation from Olaf Kirch <okir@....de>
>>
>> followed the next month by a fix to that patch:
>>
>> * Mon Feb 12 2001 Tim Waugh <twaugh@...hat.com>
>> - Fix tmpfile security patch so that it actually _works_ (bug #27155).
>
> Does anyone have information indicating that two CVE-2001-#### IDs are
> needed to cover the discoveries by Olaf Kirch and Tim Waugh 13 years
> ago? This would be the case if, for example, there was a January 2001
> a2ps package that fixed part of the problem with temporary files.
> Admittedly, the practical value of two CVE-2001-#### IDs at present
> may be extremely small.
>
> The information does not seem to be in a2ps.git because data before
> 2004 is unavailable, e.g.,
>
>    http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/a2ps.git/log/?ofs=100
>
> Also:
>
>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=27155
>    You are not authorized to access bug #27155.
>
> If (as we would expect) nobody is interested in checking that, we will
> assign one CVE-2001-#### ID.

Hello,

I spent a little time looking but could not determine if a release was 
made to fix only part of the problem. So one ID is fine by us.

bug #27155 just contains some gdb output. Therefore I assumed it was 
public and didn't check before sending it here.

Thanks for looking at this.

--
Murray McAllister / Red Hat Security Response Team

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.