Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52EF3360.90306@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 17:12:48 +1100
From: Murray McAllister <mmcallis@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: 737385@...s.debian.org
Subject: CVE request: a2ps insecure temporary file use

Hello,

Jakub Wilk found that a2ps, a tool to convert text and other types of
files to PostScript, insecurely used a temporary file in spy_user(). A
local attacker could use this flaw to perform a symbolic link attack to
modify an arbitrary file accessible to the user running a2ps:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737385

The original report notes there are calls to tempname_ensure(). If any
of those are found to be vulnerable, would they use the same CVE number,
or require a different one?

References:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737385
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060630

Thanks,

--
Murray McAllister / Red Hat Security Response Team

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.