Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEDdjHen0BZNwjoAfmRVfKtNW97XHnFn0uEJ51TwuwDfdPUjyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:39:45 +0100
From: Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@...il.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, kseifried@...hat.com
Cc: Hanno Böck <hanno@...eck.de>
Subject: Re: Re: CVE request - VLC 2.0.0 to 2.0.8

On Oct 4, 2013 5:12 PM, "Kurt Seifried" <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/04/2013 02:04 AM, Hanno Böck wrote:
> > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 22:32:12 -0600 Kurt Seifried
> > <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry forgot to reply. I'm not sure this is CVE worthy. In
> >> general crash bugs in services are CVE worthy, but crashes in
> >> client software are usually limited to things like email clients
> >> or web browsers where there is a high potential for processing
> >> untrusted data without much user interaction (e.g. displaying
> >> some random email or web page) whre you also have the potential
> >> to lose work (so there is an impact).
> >
> >> In the case of VLC you load a nasty file, it crashes, you don't
> >> do it again. There's not really any impact. You don't lose any
> >> work.
> >
> > VLC is used as a browser plugin and can also be embedded in other
> > applications. (though I'm not aware if this can crash the whole
> > browser with the modern sandboxing stuff browsers do)
>
> So if someone can test this and report back that'd be great and then
> we can deal with the CVE depending on how this plays out.
>
> - --
> Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
> PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSTujlAAoJEBYNRVNeJnmT5wYP/3ijX88DMXQH2ESddStu8bjq
> 5X4Pu+Vizi7aRFxYYg4T6XYFCvVWbzcJwQlRP1FrGzRrpS27warwz5XebZy+qGuQ
> bUgMWEnC0e06sokxJeWr2YZdBCxsTGTZdv0OzhtiRNXyoyEMogmzELhGnNh2zqWy
> VSr2eksFvIUmK5IEoxsCesbLy4mwiNixW2nvrZwS02juPpy6beyn5uKWhhU+1Phl
> O/OMf0yUEbFGFKsQOjesJwm1hIBGK6ZKn3CtlKjxLG5Z7VqmoCK9V1VlGEiyEwHr
> j4OInC6wK7NCfW+OOsg6ZQzrl5DC7CYrtT9KYtt9gpxObTk/7YhobTvYd38Abc9p
> G9sk08nOAesq0WF1c490ZmifQCkTKyZBO6NlRYo/Ci3VFbku6zOlzdyhM0LDimk/
> xLACmeGgsXFJjxaP/4gMzTIeaZR42AYljzLRqSDzlWMgAppkLxdiGyhllxmc/cXe
> MRK4s5Q1qgEdxVLgQLlltTDhcv8ZX42cg2xwraN45BIl+gl66Z1nvqhUFKKWUjNo
> CMU6g9Wjqf+nESyum3sF61n6X/et2far/nPXDn9IZZ2+8nLF8HYJKLQmzUFXyXJ0
> qBeXq6/dHzjsbZ66+c8eiLw6yH5rx9xFI66IARFFwdDzyQQPid1/Y8aAGZDwW+BQ
> YmesRzWsqCo5a4y4LN6Z
> =lLPp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hi Kurt,

Thanks for the feedback, I'll keep that in mind for the future when
requesting CVE's. I agree this is a minor issue, but because there is an
invalid memory I read I thought it was relevant.

I tested with the browser plugin on the latest Firefox, and while it
crashes the plugin, it doesn't seem to crash the browser.

As I said previously, I will continue to investigate whether I can get some
program control, but for now it's only a measly DoS.

Regards
Pedro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.