[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130326145131.GE5378@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:51:31 -0600
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: "Larry W. Cashdollar" <larry0@...com>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE request: ibutils improper use of files in /tmp
* [2013-03-26 08:28:53 -0600] Vincent Danen wrote:
Yeah, you're right. It was pointed out to me that it was noted here:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/03/19/8
Can CVE-2013-1894 be rejected? Sorry about this, I didn't notice that
it was assigned one already.
>* [2013-03-26 12:10:31 +0000] Larry W. Cashdollar wrote:
>
>>I doubled checked this, i???t looks like this was already assigned CVE-2013-2561
>
>Do you have a reference for that assignment? Because I couldn't find
>any CVE references when I was looking for it initially.
>
>>On Mar 25, 2013, at 08:09 PM, Kurt Seifried <kseifried@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>On 03/25/2013 03:49 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
>>>>It was reported on full-disclosure that ibutils suffers from
>>>>improper use of files /tmp that could allow a user to clobber files
>>>>as the user running ibutils (probably usually root).
>>>>
>>>>I didn't see a CVE request for this or anything show up here; if
>>>>one hasn't been assigned, could it be?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>References:
>>>>
>>>>http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Mar/87
>>>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927430
>>>
>>>Please use CVE-2013-1894 for this issue.
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
