oss-security - Re: CVE Request -- drupal7-views : SA-CONTRIB-2013-035 - Views

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <608296419.13968118.1364205741063.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 06:02:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: kseifried@...hat.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
        Drupal Security Team <security@...pal.org>,
        oss-security@...ts.openwall.com,
        Forest Monsen <forest.monsen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: CVE Request -- drupal7-views :
 SA-CONTRIB-2013-035 - Views - Cross Site Scripting (XSS)

Hi Kurt,

  thanks for assigning the CVE id. To follow-up
on the doubt below yet.

----- Original Message -----
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 03/22/2013 07:23 AM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
>> Hello Kurt, Steve, Drupal Security Team, vendors,
>> 
>> Drupal upstream has released: [1] http://drupal.org/node/1948358
>
> CVE-2013-1887
>
>> and updated version of the Views module (Views 7.x-3.6): [2]
>> http://drupal.org/node/1948354
>> 
>> correcting one cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw.
>
> The security issue in views is caused by various places in the views
> UI where a string is not sanitized,
> because it has been assumed to be static and by commiters, though you
> can change some of these strings using other administrative
> permissions. SA-CONTRIB-2013-035 - Views - Cross Site Scripting (XSS)
> 
> I'm a bit confused, is this via SA-CONTRIB-2013-035 or a separate
> issue as well?

Those are the same issues (it's possible to get from SA-CONTRIB-2013-035
link to the http://drupal.org/node/1948354 link [just click in at
Views 7.x-3.6 in SA-CONTRIB-2013-035]).

In yet other words, looks like CVE-2013-1887 (previously) occurred at
various places. Relevant upstream patch seems to be this one:
  http://drupalcode.org/project/views.git/commitdiff/ddf8181bd13f69ffbeeee14ae72168418785d7ac

Thank you && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team

>> AFAICT from [1], there doesn't seem to be a CVE identifier for this
>> issue yet.
>> 
>> Could you allocate one?

> - -- 
> Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
> PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRTMJrAAoJEBYNRVNeJnmTjIUP/0rn+yNqLpAPVoZJOKKjzC/O
> AComiUFEBzLPxWbJGPS8aEY738ABh3G557U3QH0xab0WKHsq4y7pOb8i2iGmUTOM
> 9t62qmZssTf80omcPZ0rKMo+dZXIXrwNsQbqB/yApuVixfbbUPKf4vF8PQVraijm
> NaBt/Gjl7G7bpHW5ZqellBNO7eHEUqAt2FQZp+UcWfR7NFASef+8BR6plrco/Sjn
> c75GySKWia99lm7qt65Q8ddT2P9ECQIoDileWzWyrWhqHpsTilWGTe+xyF5fzob4
> Zz6Z/EE0VP/ZIbfLaNip2+8Oa665T1B2tgLuUDV3jrRu11lnB3vcNfAErWdwSULM
> sy98z8NujPPmPhXa2F1jIqZN9adPHjYuvOOEYOdZL+yiA698XxRQKmHkHom4cB4Y
> FpXk/F+YrTE+Qn0XayJZriEUIzVe8z1LWC8lQDA8xWmCEptu81fIVd97A6Tk2MrV
> 4Z2pNuJ1Z3EGkZBuFNbf1FZ6M8KTbwE8qz0gEia0GpmNDegecUWewxtlxqRM4xLD
> CVfpYWN3EsS2u2M7Maw2kdHWuWjxaS69xLncVKaDB5oEFrpU61PIhLoglneDdZxH
> BgANfSjucbxvfeOWapjk0GPd9cNKQ5jtKMRZb/x6JtkLBjX+GZTMlDvI82A0BN76
> JOYCC9mTQ1uRfCHsITzV
> =gTiE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.