|
Message-ID: <507EEB6C.40506@debian.org> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:31:24 +0100 From: Simon McVittie <smcv@...ian.org> To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: CVE request: ruby file creation due in insertion of illegal NUL character On 17/10/12 10:44, Fabian Keil wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@...thhorseman.net> wrote: >> On 10/16/2012 08:40 AM, Matthias Weckbecker wrote: >>> Technically, this would also apply to Perl (at least with >>> 5.12.3). >> >> It's also the case with perl 5.14.2 (just tested). :/ > > At least for Perl I consider this a feature. It's difficult to reason about whether this is a bug or a feature without knowing the justification for treating the Ruby version as a security vulnerability, which was not included in the announcement. One possible justification is this: suppose a webapp writes files with an attacker-controlled name to the web-server-visible /uploads/ directory, using this pseudocode: if (filename ends with .jpg) { open_for_writing(filename).write(content) } else { error "that's not a JPEG, go away" } and suppose that the web server also executes *.php files in that directory. Then an attacker could upload "evil.php\0.jpg", and browse to http://example.com/uploads/evil.php to get their payload executed. Is this what the Ruby people had in mind, or is there some other attack vector I'm not seeing? > if there is no white list [of characters] in the first place, the > Perl script probably has bigger issues. As you imply, that pseudocode is a bad idea anyway: the webapp should be ensuring that the filenames match a pattern more like /^[A-Za-z0-9_]\.jpg$/ (or not allowing user-controlled filenames at all), and/or the web server should be configured so it never trusts files in the uploads directory (either as executable code or something like .htaccess). Anything vulnerable to this sort of trickery is probably vulnerable to file-overwriting attacks via "../" path segments, too. S
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.