[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FEB0D27.8080801@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:39:51 +0200
From: Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@...e.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: please verify unusual x.509 constraints are handled
Tavis Ormandy wrote:
> List, just an FYI, I've noticed a Korean CA appears to always set the cA
> bit in the X.509 basicContraints, then uses pathLenConstraint and
> keyUsage bits to restrict the results.
> [...]
> While arguably the X.509 specifications permit this, I find it hard to
> believe that these bits are checked consistently by all implementations.
> AFAICT, GnuTLS does not check these constraints, but OpenSSL does.
One thing I always wonder when x509 certificates come into play is
where to draw the line between missing feature and vulnerability.
cu
Ludwig
--
(o_ Ludwig Nussel
//\
V_/_ http://www.suse.de/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
