[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F88148A.1030109@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:56:58 +0200
From: Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
To: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala <huzaifas@...hat.com>
CC: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: CVE Request: Heap corruption in openjpeg
Thank you for this post, Huzaifa.
On 04/13/2012 09:29 AM, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> While looking at openjpeg, i found the following bug in their tracker,
> which still seems to be un-addressed.
> http://code.google.com/p/openjpeg/issues/detail?id=5
>
> I dont think a CVE id has been assigned to this issue yet.
Yes, doesn't look so one got assigned for this one yet, since:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=openjpeg
provides just recent CVE-2012-1499. To the:
http://code.google.com/p/openjpeg/issues/detail?id=5
issue itself:
1) It should get a CVE-2009-* identifier (upstream
ticket is public from 2009-Jul-31).
2) From the issue reasons investigation, it seems to
be combination of heap-based buffer invalid reads and
writes by processing certain Gray16 TIFF images, leading
to invalid free (when such corrupted memory allocated
for tile encoder / decoder handle (TCD) is attempted
to be freed).
More official description in Red Hat bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812317
Kurt, could you allocate a 2009 CVE id?
Thank you && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Response Team
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
