[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120229160133.GB24479@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:01:33 +0100
From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
Subject: Re: Re: CVE Request (minor) -- osc: Improper sanitization of terminal emulator escape sequences when displaying build log and build status
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 04:21:20PM -0700, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> On 02/28/2012 03:44 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:56:52PM +0100, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> > I am not fully convinced it needs a CVE.
> >
> > It basically boils down to the old "logfile with content that might be controlled
> > by an attacker pasted raw to a terminal" issue.
>
> Aren't these generally covered?
>
> CVE-2010-3928
> CVE-2010-2713
> CVE-2009-4487
>
> "without sanitizing non-printable characters" and so on.
Hmm yes.
So I would say yes to a CVE id. Please assign.
> > There is some more control on the person who builds a specific package what is output
> > thant there usually is in logfiles though.
> >
> > A rogue server is unlikely, however a malicious packager could echo "bad escape code"
> > in his build and then ask for help on our IRC channels or mailinglists with package Y on project X.
> > (anyone can create an account and build packages ... and asking for help is not uncommon)
> > e.g. with "look at logfile with: 'osc buildlog home:user foopackage standard i586'.)
Ciao, Marcus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
