[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110719151300.4d435028@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:13:00 +0200
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: dfncert@...-cert.de, aland@...eradius.org
Subject: Re: CVE request: vulnerability in FreeRADIUS (OCSP)
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:19:57 +0200 dfncert@...-cert.de wrote:
> Are the published information sufficient to get a CVE number for the
> issue?
Was your intention to request a CVE for a still-to-remain-non-public
issue to be disclosed in the future, or actually make the issue public?
I'm CCing upstream (Alan DeKok), as it seems this thread may be giving
out more info than expected. Alan, this is part of the following
discussion:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/5489
--
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
