[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <479180174.64225.1302695479209.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:51:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Closed list
----- Original Message -----
>
> Your initial e-mail indicated we would be part of this new group since we
> where a vendor-sec member. Now there are new requirements we have to
> meet. Is there a possibility of a probationary period so we can try to
> comply to these new requirements and still be on the closed list?
>
I don't want to start arguing technicalities, semantics, or politics. Here
is my current view, I'm going to leave the final decision up to Solar
Designer, I view this as Openwall's list.
We have rejected certain membership requests because they are not currently
releasing security updates. I agree with this policy, I would say my
initial mail was too vague. This instance is no different. It's clear that
one of the membership requirements is now producing security updates. If
you can show you're doing this, that's grounds for membership in my
opinion.
Thanks.
--
JB
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
