[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110224172834.GI30355@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:28:34 -0700
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>,
Shawn M Moore <sartak@...tpractical.com>, security@...tpractical.com,
Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Re: CVE Request -- rt3 -- two issues: 1) Improper
management of form data resubmittion upon user log out 2) SQL queries
information leak by user account transition
* [2011-02-24 18:02:06 +0100] Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>On 02/24/2011 05:45 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
>>* [2011-02-23 14:06:58 -0500] Josh Bressers wrote:
>>
>>>>Is Redhat packaging RT now, or are you just handling the CVEs?
>>>
>>>I'm not aware of Red Hat packaging RT. I'm just assign CVE ids to
>>>public issues.
>>
>Folks, my feel is you all are picking on words and details.
It is possible that Josh didn't realize it was packaged in Fedora and
EPEL (we do package quite a few things).
>>RT3 is packaged in Fedora and EPEL.
>>
>Correct. rt3 is community maintained in Fedora and RHEL. I am doing
>so for Fedora and other people do for RHEL.
>So, strictly speaking it's not "Red Hat packaged", but
>community-contributed to "Red Hat owned products" (Fedora rsp. Fedora
>EPEL) and some folks @RH are filing CVS against it, for reasons I
>don't know.
I'm not sure what you mean by that last statement (filing CVS against
it). Do you mean filing bugs?
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
