[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CE0AAC5.3080506@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:36:37 +0800
From: Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
CC: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: econet iovec
Thomas, thanks for the heads-up. Appreciated it.
On 11/15/2010 12:09 AM, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> This also raises a question of whether it's worth assigning CVEs to
> every vulnerability that was fixed by a single change in the core
> code. I'm leaning towards "no".
Yeah, It wouldn't make much sense too.
Distros should backport the changes made to mitigate such issues. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/651927, and the following patches:
http://git.kernel.org/linus/253eacc070b114c2ec1f81b067d2fed7305467b0
http://git.kernel.org/linus/8acfe468b0384e834a303f08ebc4953d72fb690a
Thanks, Eugene
--
main(i) { putchar(182623909 >> (i-1) * 5&31|!!(i<7)<<6) && main(++i); }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
