[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101001201237.GU1955@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:12:37 -0600
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...hat.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: gerald@...eshark.org
Subject: Re: CVE requests: Poppler, Quassel, Pyfribidi,
Overkill, DocUtils, FireGPG, Wireshark
* [2010-09-29 15:06:31 -0400] Josh Bressers wrote:
>> 7. Wireshark BER dissector
>> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2010-09/0088.html
>>
>
>This one looks like a stack overflow, the advisory isn't very clear, but
>claims there are two possible outcomes. We can always split later if
>needed.
>CVE-2010-3445
Gerald, are you aware of this issue? Do you have further details
regarding it? I poked around in bugzilla a bit but couldn't find
anything.
It claims 1.4.0, but is not clear as to whether or not older versions
are affected.
--
Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
