[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100205164335.77544297@willson.li.ssimo.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:43:35 -0500
From: Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com>
To: Nico Golde <oss-security+ml@...lde.de>
Cc: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com, coley <coley@...re.org>
Subject: Re: Samba symlink 0day flaw
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:05:30 +0100
Nico Golde <oss-security+ml@...lde.de> wrote:
> Hey,
> * Josh Bressers <bressers@...hat.com> [2010-02-05 20:11]:
> > As many of you have probably seen, there was a supposed Samba 0day
> > flaw posted to full-disclosure and youtube.
> >
> > Samba has a response to this:
> > http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126539387432412&w=2
> >
> > I'm not sure if this should get a CVE id. It is documented behavior.
> > Somewhat unexpected though. I think changing the default is the
> > right way to go, but it may be more of a hardening measure than a
> > security fix.
> >
> > Thoughts Steve?
>
> Given the count of users that are probably affected by this and it
> not being documented in e.g. man 5 smb.conf I'd vote for yes! :)
>
> Cheers
> Nico
Sorry not clear what would not be documented in smb.conf ?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
