[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080408145604.GA5389@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:56:04 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: list: members vs. read-only subscribers
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:35:53PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
> Here is my proposal, technical issues aside (we are smart people, we'll
> figure something out).
>
> * The current member list can post unmoderated
> * New subscribers (anyone can subscribe) will be moderated by default, but
> can have the moderation flag lifted when the prove to be useful
> contributors (we need to define what a useful contributor is)
> * Non members can post, but will be moderated (if spam is an issue, we
> could consider just throwing this stuff out, but I'd really like to avoid
> it if possible)
>
> I think that this should appear as one list to the end user.
...
> For the wiki, I'd say just make it a free for all. If they take the time
> to create an account, let them make changes, we'll keep an eye on what gets
> modified. We can deal with spam if it becomes a problem.
>
> If you don't like this, speak up now, otherwise, I think it would make
> sense to find a solution that fits this model.
I am OK with your proposal, although I think that we could simply do
message moderation for all instead, with a few moderators.
Anyway, should we (Openwall) interpret the above as a request to go
ahead and apply the changes?
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
