[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080328000940.GD19773@ngolde.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:09:40 +0100
From: Nico Golde <oss-security+ml@...lde.de>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: using oss-security references in CVE
Hi Vincent,
* Vincent Danen <vdanen@...sec.ca> [2008-03-28 00:51]:
> * [2008-03-28 00:09:46 +0100] Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> >On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 18:59 -0400, Steven M. Christey wrote:
> >>In CVE, we try to provide "provenance" for every detail that makes its way
> >>into the description. Issues like rxvt and CenterIM have some details
> >>that are only publicly documented in oss-security, and I would like to add
> >>these as references.
> >
> >I agree. There shouldn't really be things like more public and less
> >public places to share security-related information.
>
> I think this list is pretty public, and is intentionally so. There
> should be no reason to hold back referring to oss-security messages as
> references for CVE names or any other vuln DB... in fact, this may even
> help the list to grow (which is ultimately what we want... within
> reason, of course).
>
> I see no problem with this.
Just that it doesn't look like two single opinions: ACK :)
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@...ber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
