[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20080327233422.GT12339@linsec.ca>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:34:22 -0600
From: Vincent Danen <vdanen@...sec.ca>
To: oss-security@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: using oss-security references in CVE
* [2008-03-28 00:09:46 +0100] Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
>On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 18:59 -0400, Steven M. Christey wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> In CVE, we try to provide "provenance" for every detail that makes its way
>> into the description. Issues like rxvt and CenterIM have some details
>> that are only publicly documented in oss-security, and I would like to add
>> these as references.
>
>I agree. There shouldn't really be things like more public and less
>public places to share security-related information.
I think this list is pretty public, and is intentionally so. There
should be no reason to hold back referring to oss-security messages as
references for CVE names or any other vuln DB... in fact, this may even
help the list to grow (which is ultimately what we want... within
reason, of course).
I see no problem with this.
--
Vincent Danen @ http://linsec.ca/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
Open Source Software Security Wiki, which is counterpart to this
mailing list.
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
