|
Message-ID: <85sgtjpekv.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 00:06:56 +0300 From: Aleksey Cherepanov <lyosha@...nwall.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: team john-users write-up for CracktheCon contest at CypherCon 2019 Aleksey Cherepanov <lyosha@...nwall.com> writes: > Aleksey Cherepanov <lyosha@...nwall.com> writes: >> Duplicate character 3 times for every position, for positions 0-35: > [...] >> Just to demonstrate endless possibilities of rules, there is the same >> rule for positions 0-124, i.e. up to max length (but position 124 is not >> meaningful for duplication): >> $ echo 123 | john --pipe --stdout 2>/dev/null \ >> --rules=': vc0V vccV vd0c vccV vc0c vb0[0Vdc] va[0-9A-V]b >a Xa1a Xa1a' >> 11123 >> 12223 >> 12333 > > Minor mistake in this rule: there is 1 position overlap between internal > packs (e.g. 0+V vs V+0), but sequential dupe suppression hides it, so > there are no dupes during hashing. > > So the rule should be the following: > --rules=': vc0V vccV vd0c vccV vc0c vb0[0Vdc] va[0-9A-U]b >a Xa1a Xa1a' > > The change is 'U' in 'va[0-9A-U]b'. > > It covers positions 0-123. For bcrypt, max length is 72 bytes. The format truncates longer candidates. So it may be interesting to reduce the rule. (I'll skip it to avoid further mistakes...) $ john --format=bcrypt --list=format-all-details Format label bcrypt [...] Max. password length 24 [worst case UTF-8] to 72 [ASCII] [...] Truncates at max. length yes [...] This truncation reflects correct real world behaviour. Shorter bounds for truncations existed too[1]. [1] https://twitter.com/solardiz/status/1075352341287747585 Thanks! -- Regards, Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.