[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78230520510a7d1785ddb84ace334882@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:03:25 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fuzzing with regular expressions
On 16 Apr, 2013, at 22:32 , Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Jan Starke <jan.starke@...ofbed.org> wrote:
>> I just changed some things and was able to speed up rexgen by the
>> factor of 5 (on my system) ..
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> How well does rexgen compare against maskprocessor?
>
> http://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=maskprocessor
I think they do different things. Rexgen is very intuitive for people that are used to regular expressions (and thus totally unintuitive for the rest of the world =).
I'd love to add a native "regexp" cracking mode to JtR so we get rid of the pipe and can resume a session. But we can't use it as long as it's C++.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
