|
Message-ID: <4FF69DD7.9000406@linuxasylum.net> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:12:07 +0200 From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <samu@...uxasylum.net> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: 1.7.9-jumbo6 opencl on nvidia On 07/05/2012 10:34 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > On 07/05/2012 03:59 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >> I notice that when I build for just op encl support or both opencl and >> cuda support that "john --test" fails: > >> OpenCL platform 0: NVIDIA CUDA, 1 device(s). >> Using device 0: NVS 4200M >> OpenCL error (UNKNOWN ERROR :() in file (common-opencl.c) at line (39) - >> (Source kernel not found!) > > Okay so I'm new at this.... it helps a lot when you actually install the > opencl kernels... *doh* > >> I am currently packaging this up for gentoo and it could be my fault but >> when I build straight from source for opencl I get this: > > > Below, however, is still a valid concern. This happens with my package > as well as with straight from source builds. > > Thanks! > >> OpenCL platform 0: NVIDIA CUDA, 1 device(s). >> Using device 0: NVS 4200M >> Local work size (LWS) 64, Global work size (GWS) 4194304 >> Benchmarking: Netscape LDAP salted SHA-1 [OpenCL]... DONE >> Many salts: 26214K c/s real, 25982K c/s virtual >> Only one salt: 22469K c/s real, 22469K c/s virtual > >> OpenCL platform 0: NVIDIA CUDA, 1 device(s). >> Using device 0: NVS 4200M >> Max local work size 1024 Error -4 >> Error -4 >> Error -4 >> Error -4 >> Error -4 >> Error -4 >> Error -4 >> Error -4 >> Error -4 >> Error -4 >> Error -4 >> Optimal local work size 1 >> (to avoid this test on next run do export LWS=1) >> Local work size (LWS) 1, Global work size (GWS) 2097152 >> Benchmarking: Raw MD5 [OpenCL]... OpenCL error >> (CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE) in file (opencl_rawmd5_fmt.c) at line >> (338) - (failed in clEnqueueWriteBuffer buffer_keys) >> OpenCL error (CL_INVALID_CONTEXT) in file (rar_fmt.c) at line (356) - >> (Error Unmapping aes_key) > hello, this happens only when you do a -test . this is well known and it'is due to some uninitialization problem during the test cycle. if you do ./john -fo:ssha-opencl -test and ./john -fo:raw-md5-opencl -test separately it should work with no problem while we are investigating the issue. cheers Samuele
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.