[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00dd01ccb52c$ced9a3e0$6c8ceba0$@net>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:08:53 -0600
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: restoration and different date
Note, the last time ETA was shown was at 0.13% with a speed of 3100k or so.
Then the next ETA was at 0.20% and the speed had risen to 3400k. Thus, the
reduction in ETA date is very valid.
Jim.
>From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com]
>2011-12-07 19:54, websiteaccess@...il.com wrote:
>> I have restored a session
>>
>> Check the date between "( )". That should be the same, no ?
>>
>> iMac-de-xxx-xx:run xxxxxx$ mpirun -np 4 ./john -restore=NTLM
>> Loaded 1 password hash (NT MD4 [128/128 X2 SSE2-16])
>> MPI: each node loaded 1/4 of wordfile to memory (about 23 KB/node)
>> 1: guesses: 0 time: 0:00:30:13 c/s: 3405K trying: 97air002abri959 -
>97vol002aide959
>> 0: guesses: 0 time: 0:00:30:13 0.20% (ETA: Sun Dec 18 07:07:59 2011)
>c/s: 3413K trying: 02note003son522 - 02fine003peu522
>
>In some cases it's normal for them to drift apart. In this case I think
>it's just because the percentage is still so low, so the ETA is a very
>rough figure. I bet they will be much closer to each other at 1% or
>more.
>
>By the way your c/s rates are very low. They should be 10 times this
>speed on a decent CPU. Maybe you are you over-booking your CPU's.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
