[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF52993.4070002@banquise.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 14:22:43 +0200
From: bartavelle@...quise.net
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: C compiler generated SSE2 code
I tested with a handful of compilers on my core 2 computer. With all
compilers the fastest code was produced with DES_BS_VECTOR = 2, no
VECTOR34 and no MIX.
The following combinations did not work at all :
DES_BS_VECTOR = 4, VECTOR34 and MIX, with gcc 4.5.0, 4.3.2 and icc 10.1.
Clang did work fine however.
The best speeds were :
Reference : Vanilla, gcc-4.5.0 : 2706K/2329K
icc 10.1 : 2662K/2259K
gcc 4.3.2 : 2692K/2314K
gcc 4.5.0 : 2713K/2332K (with your inline flags)
clang : 2763K/2363K (also with your inline flags)
What I find interesting is that clang performs so well and icc so badly.
I always thought it was a better compiler performance-wise for
intrinsics, as it performs much better than the others with md5.
I'll try icc 11 ASAP.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
