[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF11286.8010008@banquise.net>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:55:18 +0200
From: bartavelle@...quise.net
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: clang benchmarks
I did a few clang benchmarks. Here are some results (best of 5 runs) :
Vanilla john
DES 2708/2313
MD5 12232
BF 734
LM 13740
Vanilla john, replaced gcc by clang in the Makefile
DES 2704/2280
MD5 7961
BF 461
LM 15274
Vanilla john, replaced gcc by icc and changed flags to -fast
DES 2712/2292
MD5 11557
BF 696
LM 14305
Now with my MD5 implementation (uses SSE intrinsics):
gcc 15696
icc 32364
clang 19644
Details :
gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1.1)
clang version 2.0 (trunk 103935)
icc Version 10.1
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz
Linux host 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 9 22:29:32 UTC 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
