Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC606CF.1090704@bredband.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:17:51 +0200
From: "Magnum, P.I." <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: rule with multi symbols

On 04/14/2010 06:50 PM, Magnum, P.I. wrote:
> On 04/14/2010 01:52 PM, websiteaccess@...il.com wrote:
>> I would like to do that :
>> !john!
>> @john@
>> &john&
>> (john)
>> etc...
>>
>
> Az,[!@&(], A0,\p0[!@&(],
>

On second thought, it's better written

Az,[!@&(], A0,\0,

even though my previous answer does work too. It will end up the same as 
long as the \p0 range is identical to the range refered to, if I 
understand it right. Anyway this simpler rule might be a tad quicker. 
That's just a guess though.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.