|
Message-ID: <4255c2571003131023y3c5c9ab2uc6d9404102ce0565@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:23:21 -0700 From: RB <aoz.syn@...il.com> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Is JTR MPIrun can be optimized for more cores ? On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:23, Magnum, P.I. <rawsmooth@...dband.net> wrote: > john-1.7.5-jumbo2: > ------------------ > $ ./john -stdout -w=sd.lst -ru=s >file1 > words: 62570773 time: 0:00:00:12 100.00% w/s: 5171K current: snip > > $ ./john -stdout -w=sd.lst -ru=s >/dev/null > words: 62570773 time: 0:00:00:10 100.00% w/s: 5804K current: snip > > > john-1.7.5-jumbo2-fullmpi-3 using MPICH2 > ---------------------------------------- > $ ./john -stdout -w=sd.lst -ru=s >file2 > words: 62570773 time: 0:00:03:45 100.00% w/s: 277021 current: snip > ^^^^ ^^^^^^ > $ ./john -stdout -w=sd.lst -ru=s >/dev/null > words: 62570773 time: 0:00:00:29 100.00% w/s: 2124K current: snip > > > john-1.7.5-jumbo2-fullmpi-3 using OpenMPI > ----------------------------------------- > $ ./john -stdout -w=sd.lst -ru=s >file2 > words: 62570773 time: 0:00:00:13 100.00% w/s: 4693K current: snip > > $ ./john -stdout -w=sd.lst -ru=s >/dev/null > words: 62570773 time: 0:00:00:11 100.00% w/s: 5266K current: snip > > > I didn't change one single line of code, just recompiled it with openmpi > libs. This is similar to what I was seeing; I developed and tested with OpenMPI. My tests (without the jumbo patches) were simply to run 'john --test' for a few key ciphers and showed similarly significant hits in c/s rates over 10-15 runs each.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.