[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100310092640678279.e6b710dd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:26:40 +0100
From: "websiteaccess@...il.com" <websiteaccess@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Is JTR MPIrun can be optimized for more cores ?
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:05:07 +0100, Magnum, P.I. wrote:
>> I tested JTR MPI 10 with -incremental mode (compiled SSE2).
>>
>> I ran JTR with a 2 millions hashes list, with my own .chr (can
>> crack up to 10 letters/digits/some symbols)
>>
>> Here it is 3 tests (same hashes list, all identical except cores
>> numbers, duration for each test 5 minutes):
>
> This would be a more relevant test:
>
> 1. Run your first test (2 cores) for 20 minutes.
> 2. Run your second test (4 cores) for 10 minutes.
> 3. Run your third test (8 cores) for 5 minutes.
>
> and you could also throw in:
>
> 4. Run a non-mpi john for 40 minutes.
>
> Now compare the results (as in number of passwords cracked). This
> will be a better indicator of how john-mpi scales.
Here it is a new test with Magnum's advice :
------------------------------------------------------
1 core, duration 40 mn : found 8676
------------------------------------------------------
2 cores, duration 20 mn : found 8207
------------------------------------------------------
4 cores, duration 10 mn : found 7886
------------------------------------------------------
8 cores, duration 5 mn : found 7189
------------------------------------------------------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
