[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f445b980704231820y29bc8047u1ea78f21c64a0f9f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:20:40 -0700
From: "Alain Espinosa" <alainesp@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: JTR Vs PasswordPro
There are a table with some performance of know programs who crack
NTLM and MSCASH.
Tested in "Real Mode" (not benchmark) and with varius options
(different number of
hashes, different sets of characters in bruteforce). The numbers are
"average" of this
options but not big difference are noted.
(NTLM Test in Celeron D 2.66 GHz, EM64T capable, mode 32 bits):
*Tools*
*Speed (hashes / seg.) M = 1 000 000*
MDCrack 1.82 (5)
13,7M*
*My implementation*
*9,0M*
Cain y Abel 4.8 (1)
6,5M
SamInside 2.8.0.0 (3)
5,5M
LC5 (2)
5,0M
LCP 5.04 (4)
4,9M
*MDCrack only soport brute force method and load only one hash making
it very unpractice.
Besides John "incremental" is a more smart that MDCrack bruteforce.
Numbers are with only one hash, but difference inter
programs remain the same with more hashes.
(MSCASH, Test in Celeron D 2.66 GHz, EM64T capable, mode 32 bits):
*Tools*
*Speed (hashes / seg.) M = 1 000 000*
*My implementation*
*4,5M*
PasswordsPro 2.3.1.0 (3)
1,7M
Cain y Abel 4.8 (1)
1,4M
<http://www.openwall.com/john>
References
1) http://www.oxid.it
2) http://www.atstake.com/lc <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lm_hash>
3) http://www.insidepro.com/
4) http://www.lcpsoft.com/english/index.htm
5) http://mdcrack.openwall.net
<http://www.securiteam.com/tools/5JP0I2KFPA.html>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
