[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4255c2570605230721j406c1322ra76c3dfdae69ad50@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:21:03 -0500
From: "Randy B" <aoz.syn@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Compilation error for 1.7x on ppc64-linux
Looks like a mixed bag - ppc64-altivec is faster on a few (Traditional
DES, Kerberos AFS DES, MYSQL), roughly the same on several, and
considerably slower on others.
DOS line-endings for those of us who are challenged... Everything
else (v1.7.1) has remained the same since my prior posts.
On 5/21/06, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:54:22AM -0500, Randy B wrote:
> > FWIW (unbeknownst by me), Gentoo's hardened profile evidently builds
> > 32-bit compat by default; linux-ppc32-altivec compiled and runs just
> > fine. I've not (nor do I intend to) tried the 2006.0 pure 64-bit
> > profile, so I can't comment on that.
>
> Can you please post your benchmarks for linux-ppc32-altivec and
> linux-ppc64-altivec builds? I want to confirm that linux-ppc32-altivec
> is the target to recommend.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com>
> GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598
> http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail john-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
> to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
>
>
Download attachment "ppc-970-benchmark.tar.gz" of type "application/x-gzip" (1648 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
